I was interviewed on the Business Talk Radio Network, the Big Biz Show with Sully and Rust T. Nailz. I was able to state my opposition to claims that health care is a “right.”
I was interviewed on the BBC World program “World Have Your Say.” The show was broadcast to 15 million listeners, on the NPR radio network.
I have about 3 minutes to state that health care is not a right. One caller disagreed, and stated outright that others should provide him with the knee operation he needs.
I was interviewed on The Brian Wilson Show, WPSD Toledo, at 4:30 PM.
The subject was Health Care Reform: The Moral Aspects.
Mr. Wilson noted that they had considered the present health care reform proposals from legal, constitutional, political, economic perspectives, and found it to fail in every way. I replied that this is because government medicine is wrong morally, and this is why it fails in every other way.
Huffington Post: “Health Care: Why Call It a Right’?”
Rush Limbaugh read from my short discussion of HR3200, “”What does the bill, HR 3200, short-titled ‘America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009,’ actually say?”
Here are a few basic questions about House Bill HR3200, and answers to those questions from the bill itself.
My op-ed, “There is no Moral ‘Right’ to Health Care,” was published in the Durham Herald-Sun.
Cut and paste this into a Word Document, set the top and bottom margins to 1/2″, and it should print as a two-page flyer.
I was interviewed on The Doc Thompson Show, WRVA, at 5:00 PM.
The subject was agenda of the Obama Administration.
My op-ed “What ‘Right’ to Health Care?” was published in the News and Observer.
The Charlotte Tea Party Speech
Dr. John David Lewis
First delivered April 15, 2009
Charlotte, North Carolina
[This has been edited for publication. Permission is given to read it wherever defenders of liberty may gather, but to read it in full. April 19, 2009. Thank you to Char Cushman for the transcription.]
It is high time for a tea party! It is indeed high time for a tea party in America!
But to do this right, we need to understand what it means. So I want to think back for a moment to what happened over 200 years ago, at the time of the original Boston Tea Party.
The Founders of this nation brought forth a radical idea. It was truly radical, unheard of in history before this time.
This idea was the Rights of Man. The Founders knew each of us is endowed with certain inalienable rights, rights that may not be separated from our nature as autonomous beings.
These inalienable rights are:
• The Right to Life–the right to live your own life, to choose your own goals, and to preserve your own independent existence.
• The Right to Liberty, which is the right to act to achieve your goals, without coercion by other men.
• The Right to the Pursuit of Happiness, to act to achieve your own success, your own prosperity, and your own happiness, for your own sake.
• And the Right to Property—the right to gain, keep, and enjoy, the material products of your efforts.
Now unless I’m mistaken I don’t see anything here about a right to happiness. I see a right to the pursuit of happiness: the right to take the actions needed to attain one’s own happiness. Nor do I see any rights to things at all—no rights to food, clothing, healthcare or diapers. There is only a right to act to achieve those things.
These rights to act—the rights to life, to liberty, and to the pursuit of happiness—are founded on a certain view of man. Each of us is an individual, autonomous moral being, with the right to choose his own values and capable of directing his own life. Look at the person next to you, and look in the mirror—do you see the individual sovereign human being, existing for his own sake, with the right to live, to love, and to act?
This idea—the Founders’ idea of the Rights of Man—led to a radical view of government, also unheard of in history. Government was not to be inherited by the force of an entrenched aristocracy as in Europe, imposed by the divine right of kings through generations of oppression, or enforced by the force of a club. Government was to be designed, and created, by thinking men, for a single purpose: to protect and defend the Rights of Man.
Government was to be instituted by men to secure these rights. This is what the American founding documents say: “To secure these rights, governments are instituted among men.” Thinking men, armed with the idea of rights, would create a government limited to the protection of individual rights.
The relationship of the citizens to the government was from the beginning that of master and servant, we the master, government the servant. The very purpose and reason for a government is to secure our sacred, individual rights.
The results in America speak for themselves: the greatest most prosperous nation the world has ever seen. I here quote the writer Ayn Rand (and if you want to understand what is happening today, read her novel Atlas Shrugged). Ayn Rand, speaking to the graduating class at West Point, said that the United States was the first and only moral nation in the history of man, the first nation founded on a moral principle, the Rights of Man, and with a moral purpose, to secure these rights for all men.
This principle of rights is so strong that over the next generations the Americans were able to correct some original shortcomings that the Founders’ could not overcome. Slavery and the denial of women’s suffrage both fell when the principle of rights was properly applied to all men. To correct the original errors did not require a new generation to overthrow of the principle, but rather to strengthen and to deepen it, and to renew their commitment to it for everyone. And that is what we must do today.
Because something very bad has happened in America over the last century. A cancer has implanted itself in the land of the free. A cancer has grown in our government and in our society. The cancer is the idea that government is no longer to be the defender of our rights, but rather the grantor of wishes.
Over the past century the idea took hold that government’s purpose was not to secure our rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, but rather to satisfy our needs, whims and wants. That idea has been implanted in our schools, our media, and our government.
Do you wish for a better house? There’s a government housing agency that will give it to you, with taxes exhorted from those who buy their own house. Wish for health care? There is a government agency to which you can appeal, and who will extort it from others and give it to you. Do you need food? There is a welfare agency to grab the wealth needed to give you food stamps.
And who was to provide these hand-outs? The government, they say, the all-powerful being that looms over us and grants our wishes. But who is to provide what the government hands out? Every person who works and produces, while his property and the sweat of his efforts is taken from him by force, as demanded by the elite who set themselves up as our masters.
This cancer has now grown to the point where the elite ruling over us controls a budget of some four thousand billion dollars for the next year—more money than can be conceived by the human mind. The government had to grow this big—and it will continue to grow until it destroys this nation—because it is acting according to the idea that it is morally right to take the wealth from those who produce it, and to give it to those who want it.
At the root of this idea is a view of man that is totally at odds with the vision of the Founders: the modern vision of man as a whining dependent, who begs for the needs of life from an all-powerful government, which is run by an elite who claims to know what is best for us.
If we are going to challenge this monstrosity, if we are going to expunge this cancer, then we need to regain the vision of ourselves held by the American Founders. We need to stand up, and assert ourselves as autonomous moral beings with rights to our own life, liberty and the pursuit of our own happiness. We need to reject the claim that we are weak and dependent, and to assert our own competence to run our own lives.
It is going to take as great a commitment to take down this monstrous cancer as it took to build it. We’re going to have to be strong, we’re going to have to be independent in our thinking, and we are going to have to reject handouts when they are offered to us. And we’re going to have to speak out.
What I have to say to you today in essence is this. This is not an economic problem, and it is not a political problem—well, let me be precise. The economic and political crisis is real, but this crisis is caused by a deeper problem—a moral problem. The cause of the crisis is the worship of need, and the view of man as a dependent, too stupid to act for his own sake. This is what we must reject.
Do you think that this is a conspiracy to seize your wealth, Ayn Rand wrote? It is far worse than that. It is a conspiracy to seize your life, and your sense of yourself as an independent, valuable human being, and to replace it with a being who has no self-esteem and no capacity for individual action—a being doomed to beg for his sustenance from an elite who controls all wealth, and who sees no individuals, only mobs.
That is the reason we have this elite in Washington looking down on us right now. They cannot understand gatherings such as these, in which free people gather to defend liberty. They think that these gatherings must be orchestrated by a vast conspiracy, because they cannot understand how autonomous human beings might gather by their own choice, to affirm their commitment to liberty.
They think this because they don’t see autonomous moral beings making rational choices. They see only serfs, sniveling and whining, begging their masters for the scraps needed to survive, acting as a collective mob rather than as thinking individuals.
Look at yourselves again. Do you see in your face, and in the face of the person next to you, an appendage of a group, with no moral status, no rights and no liberties, who is bound from the day of birth to serve? Or do you see an autonomous being with the right to live?
Will you knuckle under and become the helpless dependent that our so-called leaders want us to be? Or will you stand tall, and defend your right to your own life, to your own liberty, to your own independent pursuit of your own happiness, and to the property you produce and trade for with other producing men?
It is time to stand up, to say no to the creed of dependence, to assert ourselves, to assert our own moral status, to defend our own lives and our own property, and to make our voices heard.
Thank you very much.
April 15, 2009
Charlotte, North Carolina